That improvement is one of the most interesting things about Tinkler right now. Last year his win rate sat at 7%, meaning roughly 1 in every 14 runners went on to win. This season it has climbed to 10% — about 1 in every 10 — across 378 runners, which is a meaningful step forward. But the last two weeks tell an even more compelling story: 4 winners from 21 runners, a win rate of 19%, or nearly 1 in every 5. That kind of short-term form is the thing punters and fellow trainers notice, and it suggests the yard is firing on all cylinders right now.
Redcar is where Tinkler has made his name on a specific track. Nine winners from 38 runners there is the sort of record that speaks for itself — it means he has cracked the code of that particular course, whether through knowing its quirks, preparing horses to suit the conditions, or simply running the right horses in the right races. For anyone watching his horses at Redcar, that context matters enormously.
There is an interesting wrinkle in his record on wet and muddy ground. With only 9 races run in those conditions, the sample size is small, but 2 wins from those 9 — roughly 1 in 4 — hints that Tinkler may have a good eye for placing horses when the ground gets testing. It is worth watching.
His most productive partnership in the saddle is with jockey Faye McManoman, who has ridden 138 times for the yard and brought home 11 winners together. That works out to about 1 win in every 12 or 13 rides — not a thunderous win rate, but 138 rides is a deep level of trust and familiarity, and those relationships tend to improve over time. One name that does not appear in Tinkler's success story, however, is Believeinmenow — a horse the yard has run 10 times without a single win between them. Ten races together and nothing to show for it is unusual enough to stand out; it has simply never clicked with that particular horse. For a trainer otherwise trending sharply upward, it remains one small unfinished chapter.
| Course | Races | Wins | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newcastle | 85 | 8 | 9.4% |
| Redcar | 38 | 9 | 23.7% |
| Doncaster | 38 | 4 | 10.5% |
| Beverley | 28 | 3 | 10.7% |
| Southwell | 23 | 0 | 0% |
| Thirsk | 22 | 1 | 4.5% |
| York | 20 | 2 | 10% |
| Ripon | 17 | 1 | 5.9% |
| Pontefract | 14 | 0 | 0% |
| Carlisle | 11 | 1 | 9.1% |
| Catterick Bridge | 10 | 2 | 20% |
| Nottingham | 10 | 1 | 10% |
| Leicester | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Haydock Park | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Chester | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| chelmsford | 6 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Musselburgh | 5 | 1 | 20% |
| Ascot | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| Ayr | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| Bath | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| Great Yarmouth | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Hamilton Park | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Chepstow | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Wolverhampton | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Kempton Park | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| Newmarket | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Salisbury | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Epsom Downs | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Newbury | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| The Curragh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Windsor | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Goodwood | 1 | 0 | 0% |