The partnership with jockey Dylan Hogan is the most frequently used combination in the yard, and the sheer volume of 52 rides together tells you Jones trusts him with a wide range of horses. Two wins from those 52 rides is a modest return — just 1 in every 26 — but partnership statistics in racing can be misleading. Plenty of those rides will be on horses sent out to gain experience, not to win, and the relationship between a trainer and a retained jockey is built on far more than the headline numbers.
Where Jones does show a clear edge is on wet or muddy ground. Five wins from 27 races in those conditions gives him a win rate of 19% — roughly 1 in every 5 — which is nearly double his overall average. That is not a fluke. It suggests he either specifically targets soft-ground days with the right horses, or that his training methods genuinely suit animals who travel better through give in the turf. Either way, it is a pattern worth paying attention to.
The partnership with Afton Down — one win from four races together — is a small sample, but the fact it stands out as notable suggests it may be a horse the yard holds in some regard. One from four is not a dramatic record, but in racing, the right one win at the right moment can define a horse's season.
At just three years in, Jones is still assembling the kind of track record that will take another few seasons to fully read. But 103 winners in total, a productive recent run, and a clear ability to place horses well in certain conditions are exactly the foundations a trainer needs. The next couple of years will show whether the early promise was the start of something substantial.
| Course | Races | Wins | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lingfield Park | 51 | 8 | 15.7% |
| Wolverhampton | 45 | 5 | 11.1% |
| Southwell | 34 | 4 | 11.8% |
| Kempton Park | 17 | 1 | 5.9% |
| chelmsford | 15 | 2 | 13.3% |
| Great Yarmouth | 11 | 0 | 0% |
| Leicester | 9 | 1 | 11.1% |
| Nottingham | 8 | 2 | 25% |
| Windsor | 7 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Newbury | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Doncaster | 7 | 0 | 0% |
| Thirsk | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| Bath | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| Brighton | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| Redcar | 6 | 0 | 0% |
| Ripon | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| Newmarket | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| Ascot | 5 | 0 | 0% |
| Huntingdon | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| Goodwood | 4 | 0 | 0% |
| Salisbury | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Stratford-on-Avon | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Haydock Park | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Warwick | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Newcastle | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Ffos Las | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Worcester | 2 | 2 | 100% |
| Fontwell Park | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| Cheltenham | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Chepstow | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Chester | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| York | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Catterick Bridge | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Ludlow | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| Pontefract | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| hereford | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Newton Abbot | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Sandown Park | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Musselburgh | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| Beverley | 1 | 0 | 0% |