:

Gina Mangan

Four years into her career, Gina Mangan has already passed 116 winners — a number that takes some jockeys twice as long to reach. In the last twelve months alone she has ridden 33 winners from 357 races, which works out at roughly 1 in every 11. That is a solid, professional return that reflects consistent work across a full book of rides rather than a handful of fortunate opportunities.Based on TrackLab's AI analysis
Quick Facts
Role
Jockey
Record
33 wins from 357 races
Win rate
9.2%
Best course
Newcastle (30% from 10 races)
Best going
Heavy (very wet)

📊 Key Numbers

A snapshot of this jockey's performance over the last 12 months
357
Races
33
Wins
9.2%
Win rate
avg ~10%
28.6%
Place rate (top 3)
avg ~30%

🔍 Full Analysis

TrackLab's AI-generated assessment based on career data and recent form
TrackLab's Jockey Breakdown
Auto-Generated

The most telling number in her record is what happens when she teams up with trainer Christopher Mason. From 65 races together they have produced 11 winners — a win rate of around 1 in every 6. That is nearly double her overall average, which suggests something more than coincidence. When a jockey and trainer find a real rhythm, it usually means they communicate well, trust each other's judgement, and the trainer knows exactly which races to target. That partnership looks like one worth following.

There are also two specific conditions where Mangan tends to outperform. On very wet, muddy ground she has won 2 from 14 races — 14%, which is above her season average and meaningful in a sample where those conditions can genuinely sort the field. Handling a horse confidently when the ground is heavy is a skill in itself, and it suggests she rides with good balance and timing rather than relying on fast ground to do the work. Newcastle is the other one to note: 3 winners from just 10 rides there is a sharp return, and a track where a jockey consistently delivers tends to be a track they understand well — the turns, the draw, the way the pace typically develops.

Still only four years in, Mangan is building exactly the kind of profile that attracts better and better horses. The raw numbers are already convincing, and she has a standout trainer partnership and two clear conditions in which she excels. The foundations are in place.

📈 Form Trend

How this jockey's win rate has changed month by month
Monthly win rate
2025–2026
5%
Apr
16.7%
May
19.5%
Jun
2.3%
Jul
4.9%
Aug
5.4%
Sep
11.5%
Oct
5.3%
Nov
11.1%
Dec
14.3%
Jan
7.4%
Feb
0%
Mar

🎯 Where This Jockey Thrives

Performance broken down by ground, class, and track type
🌧 Ground Conditions
Heavy (very wet)
Loves
Good (firm-ish)
Good to firm
Soft (muddy)
Standard (all-weather)
Ok
Firm (dry)
Good to soft
Avoids
Standard to slow
Avoids
🏅 Competition Level
Class 2
Avoids
Class 3
Loves
Class 4
Class 5
Ok
Class 6
🏟 Track Shape
Left-handed, wide and galloping
Left-handed, tight turning
Left-handed, undulating
Right-handed, tight turning
Right-handed, undulating
Ok
Wide and galloping
Ok
Left-handed, tight
Right-handed, wide and galloping
Avoids

🏇 Trainer Partnerships

The trainers they work with most, sorted by rides together
Christopher Mason First Choice
16.9%
Win rate
11/65
Won / Rode
17.6%
Win rate
6/34
Won / Rode
3.4%
Win rate
1/29
Won / Rode
22.7%
Win rate
5/22
Won / Rode
15%
Win rate
3/20
Won / Rode
15%
Win rate
3/20
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/12
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/12
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/10
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/10
Won / Rode
11.1%
Win rate
1/9
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/7
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/7
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/7
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/5
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/5
Won / Rode

Top Horses

The strongest horses currently associated with this jockey
Form: 1-5312
Form: -36231
Form: /680-1
Form: 6-6595
Form: 1-3252
Form: -24542
Form: 1-1144
Form: 1-4323
Form: 76-321
Form: 254-51

🏟 Course Record

Win rate at each course, sorted by number of races
CourseRacesWinsWin rate
Wolverhampton 85 4 4.7%
Lingfield Park 51 4 7.8%
Chepstow 36 6 16.7%
Bath 23 4 17.4%
Southwell 16 3 18.8%
chelmsford 13 1 7.7%
Ffos Las 13 0 0%
Windsor 11 2 18.2%
Kempton Park 11 0 0%
Newcastle 10 3 30%
Nottingham 10 1 10%
Great Yarmouth 9 1 11.1%
Brighton 9 0 0%
Salisbury 9 0 0%
Carlisle 6 1 16.7%
Newbury 6 0 0%
Epsom Downs 6 0 0%
Pontefract 5 1 20%
Doncaster 4 0 0%
Leicester 4 0 0%
Ascot 3 0 0%
Sandown Park 3 0 0%
Haydock Park 2 1 50%
Catterick Bridge 2 1 50%
Goodwood 2 0 0%
Newmarket 2 0 0%
Beverley 1 0 0%
Hamilton Park 1 0 0%
Ayr 1 0 0%
Thirsk 1 0 0%
Ripon 1 0 0%
Chester 1 0 0%

📅 Recent Results

The last 20 results, most recent first
23 Mar
Wolverhampton · 7f – 1m · Standard
4th
21 Mar
Southwell · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
5th
20 Mar
Wolverhampton · 7f – 1m · Standard
4th
16 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
10th
14 Mar
Southwell · Long Distance (2m+) · Standard
4th
13 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
3rd
11 Mar
Southwell · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
2nd
11 Mar
Southwell · 5f – 6½f · Standard
10th
10 Mar
Wolverhampton · Long Distance (2m+) · Standard
2nd
10 Mar
Wolverhampton · Long Distance (2m+) · Standard
2nd
9 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
3rd
9 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
3rd
7 Mar
Wolverhampton · 5f – 6½f · Standard
7th
4 Mar
Southwell · Long Distance (2m+) · Standard
4th
2 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
2nd
2 Mar
Wolverhampton · 5f – 6½f · Standard
8th
28 Feb
Southwell · 1m3f – 1m4f · Standard
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 5f – 6½f · Standard