:

Bernard Llewellyn

Four years into his training career, Bernard Llewellyn is still very much in the building phase. Since taking out his licence in 2021, he has sent out 33 career winners — a steady if modest foundation — but the last 12 months have been a grind. Seven winners from 169 runners works out at roughly 1 in every 24 races, a 4% win rate that tells you this is a small yard where every winner genuinely matters.Based on TrackLab's AI analysis
Quick Facts
Role
Trainer
Based
Fochriw, Mid Glamorgan
Record
7 wins from 169 races
Win rate
4.1%
Top jockey
Best course
Ffos Las (7.4% from 68 races)
Best going
Heavy (very wet)

📊 Key Numbers

A snapshot of this trainer's performance over the last 12 months
169
Races
7
Wins
4.1%
Win rate
avg ~10%
26.0%
Place rate (top 3)
avg ~30%

🔍 Full Analysis

TrackLab's AI-generated assessment based on career data and recent form
TrackLab's Trainer Breakdown
Auto-Generated

Some of the numbers are harder to explain away. His most frequent jockey partnership is with Jordan Williams, but across 21 rides together they have yet to visit the winner's enclosure — not once. Likewise, his most regularly run horse Beaune has gone 14 races without a win under Llewellyn's watch. At some point a trainer has to ask whether a partnership is working, and 14 races is a long time to wait for an answer.

There is, however, one real bright spot in the data. On wet, muddy ground — the kind of conditions that make most trainers wince — Llewellyn's horses have won 3 from 18 races, a 17% win rate that is dramatically better than his overall figures and works out to nearly 1 in every 6 runners. That is not a fluke. It suggests he either specifically targets those conditions, has horses in his yard that are physically built for the mud, or both. In a sport where most small trainers simply take what they can get, finding a genuine edge in any conditions is worth paying attention to.

At four years in, Llewellyn is still learning his trade. The overall numbers are lean, but 33 career winners shows he is operational and competitive, and that wet-ground record hints at a trainer who knows his horses and picks his spots carefully. The question is whether he can translate that niche strength into something broader as his yard develops.

📈 Form Trend

How this trainer's win rate has changed month by month
Monthly win rate
2025–2026
0%
May
6.9%
Jun
10.5%
Jul
0%
Aug
13.6%
Sep
0%
Oct
0%
Nov
0%
Dec
0%
Jan
0%
Feb
0%
Mar
0%
Apr

🎯 Where This Trainer Thrives

Performance broken down by ground, class, and track type
🌧 Ground Conditions
Heavy (very wet)
Loves
Good to firm
Loves
Soft (muddy)
Good (firm-ish)
Ok
Good to soft
Ok
Firm (dry)
Standard (all-weather)
Avoids
Standard to slow
Avoids
🏅 Competition Level
Class 3
Class 4
Avoids
Class 5
Ok
Class 6
🏟 Track Shape
Left-handed, tight
Loves
Left-handed, wide and galloping
Left-handed, tight turning
Avoids
Left-handed, undulating
Avoids
Right-handed, undulating
Avoids
Wide and galloping
Avoids
Right-handed, tight turning
Avoids
Right-handed, wide and galloping
Avoids

🏇 Jockey Partnerships

The riders they work with most, sorted by rides together
Jordan Williams First Choice
0%
Win rate
0/21
Won / Rode
Elizabeth Gale
10.5%
Win rate
2/19
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/17
Won / Rode
8.3%
Win rate
1/12
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/9
Won / Rode
Shay Farmer
14.3%
Win rate
1/7
Won / Rode
14.3%
Win rate
1/7
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/7
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/6
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/5
Won / Rode
25%
Win rate
1/4
Won / Rode
25%
Win rate
1/4
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/4
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
Jay Tidball
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/3
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode
Jack Dace
0%
Win rate
0/2
Won / Rode

Top Horses

The strongest horses currently associated with this trainer
Form: 236-12
Form: 4546-5
Form: 3/5740
Form: 424-45
Form: 080-39
Form: 334-58
Form: 36167-
Form: 14175-
Form: 343-69
Form: 24985-

🏟 Course Record

Win rate at each course, sorted by number of races
CourseRacesWinsWin rate
Ffos Las 68 5 7.4%
Wolverhampton 26 0 0%
Chepstow 20 1 5%
Bath 9 0 0%
Chester 6 1 16.7%
Lingfield Park 6 0 0%
Southwell 5 0 0%
Leicester 3 0 0%
Kempton Park 3 0 0%
Newton Abbot 2 0 0%
hereford 2 0 0%
Uttoxeter 2 0 0%
Exeter 2 0 0%
chelmsford 2 0 0%
Ludlow 2 0 0%
Doncaster 2 0 0%
Sedgefield 2 0 0%
Salisbury 1 0 0%
Worcester 1 0 0%
Nottingham 1 0 0%
Newbury 1 0 0%
Pontefract 1 0 0%
Thirsk 1 0 0%
Bangor-on-Dee 1 0 0%

📅 Recent Results

The last 20 results, most recent first
4 Apr
Wolverhampton · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
7th
4 Apr
Wolverhampton · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
6th
31 Mar
Wolverhampton · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
2nd
29 Mar
Doncaster · 1m1f – 1m2f · Good_To_Soft
2nd
28 Mar
Doncaster · 1m3f – 1m4f · Good_To_Soft
13th
27 Mar
Lingfield Park · 1m3f – 1m4f · Standard
7th
26 Mar
Chepstow · Long Distance (2m+) · Good_To_Soft
2nd
25 Mar
Lingfield Park · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
4th
25 Mar
Lingfield Park · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
2nd
25 Mar
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
2nd
14 Mar
Southwell · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
2nd
12 Mar
chelmsford · 1m3f – 1m4f · Standard
5th
11 Mar
Southwell · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
5th
11 Mar
Southwell · 7f – 1m · Standard
9th
1 Mar
Ffos Las · 1m6f – 2m · Heavy
25 Feb
Bangor-on-Dee · Long Distance (2m+) · Soft
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 7f – 1m · Standard
25 Feb
Lingfield Park · 1m6f – 2m · Standard
23 Feb
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
9th
23 Feb
Wolverhampton · 1m1f – 1m2f · Standard
8th